link:
This story shows how the Internet allows readers to participate in a debate after reading about an issue. With print media, readers could discuss stories they read, but not as effectively as they can using digital technology. People are able to discuss the issue with other people they would never communicate with otherwise. After reading the article, readers can look at the comments below to get further educated with all sides of the debate. When people look at the discussion boards, they see the entire argument and can judge for themselves what they think. This teaches readers to be more responsible and productive news consumers. Really, the news doesn't matter if nobody acts on it, and interaction on the Internet encourages responses from readers. One of the greatest things about the two-way communication on the Internet is that readers can demand that the news organization follow-up on the story to address unresolved issues. Also, a reader might say something that isn't stated in the story, that might need further examination. In this way, the writer becomes a listener, and the traditional roles in the legacy news model are switched. The article I looked at in The Echo, is a prime example of a story that creates a lot of debate because gun control is one of the fundamental issues that people have argued about throughout history. It is only through debate and collaboration that we can find solutions to these issues that have plagued our country for so many years. The Internet makes it easier than ever for people to participate a national, and now international, debate. I think the Internet is a blessing, that may one day help us sort out our issues and finally compromise on solutions to serious problems. Of course, it will be up to journalists to help set that agenda and add credibility to the debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment